The enemy
are our
blind spots
Although the explicit intention of the author Sudhir Kakar in question the cultural validity of psychoanalysis, a topic which is immersed in a very interesting, my experience of the text focused on surprised to realize that I have had a point of view or conceptual framework, I have definitions as paradigms, and of course my eyes are not "universally suitable" for everything. It seemed more fun than anyone I remember the glass through which I read reality, and I remember the fact that there is a crystal. A coconut on the head.
So the task here would be to clearly state these definitions that correspond to my socio-cultural moment and determine what I understand.
is about knowing the failure of thought, transcending its roots (p. 547).
Only by knowing the enemy one can be alert, and measured against him.
The enemy are our blind spots.
I realize I have an idea of \u200b\u200bthe mind as an isolated island of individual consciousness, deeply conscious of its subjectivity and its tendency unlimited child of illusion and projection neglected (p. 551).
What is this modern psychological? It
I have a modern vision of human experience according to which each of us lives in his subjective world ... (p. 551). And I can only plead guilty. Lenses have been named the world that I see and understand reality. And I love, "but I guess that is not subject to this moment.
writes that the essence of modernity internalization is psychological rather than outsourcing, where is the source of vitality, has an internal or external one?
allows me to ask me that question.
says that psychoanalysis can access the Indian individuality if the therapist is willing and able to build bridges between traditional and modern individuality.
I think, however, that in the privacy of the office, the task of building bridges is a task that must be undertaken during each of the last minutes of the meeting, and the difficulty of reaching the other does not belong to the universe of culture.