Intimacy Performing Psychoanalysis and Judaism
Being Jewish is not in substance, but motion
, wandering. [ 1]
Sometimes one is fortunate to make contact with living things. And the contact Announces fertility. Some other times the type of contact that you establish with the word can make a book, a living relationship, a contact bearing. When one is truly lucky get his hands on a particular book that returns one to a contact relationship.
To me, this is the case with the book of Betty B. Fuks " Freud and Jewishness: the vocation of exile " Siglo XXI Editores.
This text is just a thank you letter to fortune. A riddle
which is inherited through the generations. There is a knowledge that is inherited through the generations. The transmission itself is an enigma. But if something we know is that the transmission allows the passage of the story, without stopping by the passage of centuries and generations of exiles.
The Talmud is the spiritual production process of a people, based on respect for truth and knowledge, recorded stories, discussions and thoughts expressed hundreds of teachers over more than 2000 years. Is a collection of books has been collected and codified the treasure of the law, folklore, legends, theological controversies, beliefs, social and civil requirements central to Judaism. Is its strength creative spirit and permanent, which holds the roots of thought rooted in the past and lost, with a constant need for renewal and life that has to emerge with each new reading of some old acquaintance by time. It's about the enigma of an archaic heritage transmission between generations. [2]
exile holds the generations. An exile needed to recreate a territory constantly replaced intangible territory of Eretz Yisroel [3] lost. This exile is experienced as a condition for the advent of his word. Coincidentally
Freudian word, "likewise seeking the advent of a new word," demand a special kind of exile that enable the emergence of the true word, the word comes from the unconscious.
One withdrew, not without regret, of the known territory of consciousness.
You become a stranger to himself to hear the unheard, to see that other where there is no self-recognition.
Where I am outside myself. That's
deterritorialization Freud demanded to show the possibility of an analysis.
(...) it seems legitimate to claim that this paper brings to light the need Freud the analyst to make possible, within his profession impossible exile necessary that each patient experiences as a condition for the advent of his word.
(...) where the word acts as an endless thread that weaves the story of the empty (...) [4]
In the Jewish reading of a text is the sign away what gives life to the speech, which allows the constant questioning and always looking for new meaning. This is jumping stories and themes, contradictions, repetitions, omissions, with strange jumps in time. The Talmud asks the blind spots of the text, Freud asked about the blind spots of consciousness. The Jewish Freud in the psychoanalysis as its best practice of non-identical, the de-identification and desire of the difference. This is the way of analysis.
be recalled that in Hebrew the original language, the word can only be read by anyone who knows it, and in the context where he, the reader is located. Without the constancy of vowels, a word can have several meanings depending on who reads only. In both contexts, psychoanalysis and Judaism, there is a demand that the interpreter does not prevent the occurrence of the word and build idols instead of symbols. The plurality of meanings is a demand for thought. From this point of view there is only "the atheist position" as one ensures readings are always open, and is the enemy of fixed idols are closed and sterile look. It begins with a disclaimer, (...) requires an interpreter atheist position, that is, someone who does not prevent the advent of the word and thus becomes an idol writing in totem. [5]
Nearly two centuries before Freud, in 70 BC, saw the Temple destroyed and the Jews expelled from Jerusalem, Rabbi Yohanan ben Zakkai understood that without Temple, landless and without walls, was the study, and without a particular territory only is that they can build momentum through a study of intergenerational transmission of the Act, a line of continuity and contiguity to the present through the question. Asked everyone to continue observing the Mosaic Law in wherever they were, bowing to Di-s, well individually, through reading and interpreting the Word of Scripture, the Talmud. The ancient practice of literacy is the core text of Judaism and structuring the security of your transmission.
The Torah, the Talmud is the "portable homeland" of the Jewish people.
The spirit in which it invests psychoanalysis in history analysis of the subject and ask for it, so do not know, what is to be appointed, shares all the sense in the way that Jews obey the commandment of Zahora (remember): obligation to the memory of the history of people of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. This command has the function of re-opening in each memory, the act of foundation of the covenant.
The recall is not a request is an order. This is the Act of Remembrance of who we are, a current identity based on the chain of generations. Or ideas.
In Judaism, the Torah is considered as an inexhaustible source of learning and wisdom, in which the subject plays above With the text, making sense to multiply. In the Jewish culture, it instructs the reader of the sacred stories to sail on the river of polysemy, deconstruct the text, spread the centers of interest and key questions in the blanks. This ancient practice of reading Scripture says that Judaism is permanently allocated to the incompleteness and feed their own insatiable hunger. [6]
Finally, be on the reading of a text, or unconscious, is a thought turned to otherness, who lives in a place (...) close relationship which is designed as disjunction. [7]
Freud discovered a method of listening, and (...) this new space, a new topology of the soul, where all the contradictions coexist. [8] and alludes to the desire to think the unthinkable, the unspeakable and invisible. The drive.
The drive is a limit concept between the psychic and somatic, ie, does not belong to one or other record but is between the two. It is, however, a first engine that drives everything. The drive forcefully illustrates the position of psychoanalysis atopic. Because if something makes the drive is just that: move, push, has a goal and direction. Not return to where it already was. Run rendering representation of narrative in the story, the script in script, character in character, from story to story, as in the Torah. Freud exposes
2-way analysis of apprehension, which in principle would seem entirely exclusive: the way of deciphering meaning, and the path of psychic energy and the economy: energy and direction in the same space, the first and second topical connecting on their own contributions. Seduction and fantasy, establishing a complex set of mutual interference.
A set of interpretations of the occult who had no territory within the time when Freud's work appeared in the first 40 years of the twentieth century, when the rational demands of logical coherence and synthesis inherent positive science closed its doors, because the unconscious is located in another register, (...) is about the inconsistency, the unspeakable and invisible. [9]
Psychoanalysis announced at that time as a method of listening to the incoherent, the non-identical and the deformed, always obeying the logic of another. [10]
Derrida is a theoretical discussion of writing that the privilege accorded to speech and voice in the West. Insists on showing that writing produces many ways.
deconstruct a text, according to this philosopher, is to denounce what it was privileged, on behalf of it, pointing out what was repressed, appreciate it and insert it into a new context.
is a relentless critic working for the displacement of meaning and the possibility of inscribing new meanings.
Exile is to make the subject look - in the discouragement of repetition and gradual deconstruction of his own idolatry - the encounter with the stranger who has in himself, face to face with the unknown, which implies the risk of encountering the ever wandering drive impersonal force, a force for all time and all men. Experience
analytical exile, then, learning of otherness allows the subject to look through a designation for that word, coming from outside, this in itself, although it is strange. [11]
This difference in ourselves that psychoanalysis seeks to engage the haunting enigma: the same runout of know unconscious "and its condition of possibility, the drive, installed an impregnable place of otherness in the psychoanalytic field. [12]
"The uncanny" is the most appropriate translation for the title of the essay "Das Unheimliche" written in 1919 in which Freud developed the idea that there is an intrinsic strangeness the subject.
The strange thing is the horrific truth of the subject, referring to what he does as much is known and familiar:
helplessness.
means what I miss being at the same time as foreign and the depths, is inaccessible to a transparent look, by contrast comes in the form of anguish and horror of dull compared to her appearance: face to face with what has no name, which is beyond fantasy and , as Lacan shows in his seminar "Anxiety", affect the subject of the unconscious, which arises when the ego is confronted with the strange, the anguish.
(...) The death drive reveals the dimension of human existence as something unattainable to any totalizing knowledge. This is a concept which, no doubt, psychoanalysis will ensure not to lock on itself, forcing him to constantly interact with the difference: there is no name on Freudianism that does not stop not being written which guarantees the future. [13]
B
long time there are records about the reading of Bible stories as metaphors for talking about dialogue between the subject and what is beyond language.
The black side of that search becomes aggressive dimension that appears in front of the other's difference. The aggression will not wake up in front of a difference either, wake up from that of other causes distress in the subject.
And when Psychoanalysis speaks of horror of castration are talking of the anguish that makes the difference. [14]
The anguish, the bitter sound of silence, this gap arises against stunning, known them all: the passage through the desert, the exile to which it is intended to expand birth.
The great metaphor for thinking about the phenomenon of transference in the analysis, the Song of Songs, a biblical poem dramatizes the paradox of a meeting always, always impossible and that in itself is its persistence and separation. Intoxicating.
And I think that is where ethics comes, the responsibility and awareness of caring for one's own aggression.
psychoanalysis must remain a discipline that calls and demands the responsibility of the subject by the other. [15]
is to witness the unbridled instinctual struggle that is played in every word and every image, favoring life as a way of dealing with homelessness.
Foundations of the drive is based on the inability to set a performance: the drive is translated only as a power that is present in ephemeral and transient performances. [16]
analytical treatments of Freud, since he discovered the transfer [17] , came to have as a method of receiving and analyzing wake up in the drive energies (affection) and repressed memories (.. .) This golden rule leads to the necessary presence of the absence of the object [18] to circulate the drive.
All Freud's recommendations on the management of the transfer, far from constituting moral rules require that the analyst take the place of object of desire for the analysis, if the analyst does not agree, then the flow is impeded drive by which the subject emerges.
transfer
Love hinders the cure, the analyst is what leads to the treatment as long as you know rely on him to accept the love, we analyze that weaves his story with words of love for each other. [19]
All Freud never tired of showing his work along the unconscious complaint is that the death of a complete truth, beauty.
Read the unconscious is to admit that there will always be a remainder assimilated.
floating listening, then, the means by which the ear reads, ie, the analyst is set to hear a text that is out of the landscape, itself invisible, hence to make the necessary structures to ensure the continuity of the working of the patient.
Thus, the analyst also is a reader of the infinite melody of the drive. Sabina
Alazraki
May 2007
Being Jewish is not in substance, but motion
, wandering. [ 1]
Sometimes one is fortunate to make contact with living things. And the contact Announces fertility. Some other times the type of contact that you establish with the word can make a book, a living relationship, a contact bearing. When one is truly lucky get his hands on a particular book that returns one to a contact relationship.
To me, this is the case with the book of Betty B. Fuks " Freud and Jewishness: the vocation of exile " Siglo XXI Editores.
This text is just a thank you letter to fortune. A riddle
which is inherited through the generations. There is a knowledge that is inherited through the generations. The transmission itself is an enigma. But if something we know is that the transmission allows the passage of the story, without stopping by the passage of centuries and generations of exiles.
The Talmud is the spiritual production process of a people, based on respect for truth and knowledge, recorded stories, discussions and thoughts expressed hundreds of teachers over more than 2000 years. Is a collection of books has been collected and codified the treasure of the law, folklore, legends, theological controversies, beliefs, social and civil requirements central to Judaism. Is its strength creative spirit and permanent, which holds the roots of thought rooted in the past and lost, with a constant need for renewal and life that has to emerge with each new reading of some old acquaintance by time. It's about the enigma of an archaic heritage transmission between generations. [2]
exile holds the generations. An exile needed to recreate a territory constantly replaced intangible territory of Eretz Yisroel [3] lost. This exile is experienced as a condition for the advent of his word. Coincidentally
Freudian word, "likewise seeking the advent of a new word," demand a special kind of exile that enable the emergence of the true word, the word comes from the unconscious.
One withdrew, not without regret, of the known territory of consciousness.
You become a stranger to himself to hear the unheard, to see that other where there is no self-recognition.
Where I am outside myself. That's
deterritorialization Freud demanded to show the possibility of an analysis.
(...) it seems legitimate to claim that this paper brings to light the need Freud the analyst to make possible, within his profession impossible exile necessary that each patient experiences as a condition for the advent of his word.
(...) where the word acts as an endless thread that weaves the story of the empty (...) [4]
In the Jewish reading of a text is the sign away what gives life to the speech, which allows the constant questioning and always looking for new meaning. This is jumping stories and themes, contradictions, repetitions, omissions, with strange jumps in time. The Talmud asks the blind spots of the text, Freud asked about the blind spots of consciousness. The Jewish Freud in the psychoanalysis as its best practice of non-identical, the de-identification and desire of the difference. This is the way of analysis.
be recalled that in Hebrew the original language, the word can only be read by anyone who knows it, and in the context where he, the reader is located. Without the constancy of vowels, a word can have several meanings depending on who reads only. In both contexts, psychoanalysis and Judaism, there is a demand that the interpreter does not prevent the occurrence of the word and build idols instead of symbols. The plurality of meanings is a demand for thought. From this point of view there is only "the atheist position" as one ensures readings are always open, and is the enemy of fixed idols are closed and sterile look. It begins with a disclaimer, (...) requires an interpreter atheist position, that is, someone who does not prevent the advent of the word and thus becomes an idol writing in totem. [5]
Nearly two centuries before Freud, in 70 BC, saw the Temple destroyed and the Jews expelled from Jerusalem, Rabbi Yohanan ben Zakkai understood that without Temple, landless and without walls, was the study, and without a particular territory only is that they can build momentum through a study of intergenerational transmission of the Act, a line of continuity and contiguity to the present through the question. Asked everyone to continue observing the Mosaic Law in wherever they were, bowing to Di-s, well individually, through reading and interpreting the Word of Scripture, the Talmud. The ancient practice of literacy is the core text of Judaism and structuring the security of your transmission.
The Torah, the Talmud is the "portable homeland" of the Jewish people.
The spirit in which it invests psychoanalysis in history analysis of the subject and ask for it, so do not know, what is to be appointed, shares all the sense in the way that Jews obey the commandment of Zahora (remember): obligation to the memory of the history of people of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. This command has the function of re-opening in each memory, the act of foundation of the covenant.
The recall is not a request is an order. This is the Act of Remembrance of who we are, a current identity based on the chain of generations. Or ideas.
In Judaism, the Torah is considered as an inexhaustible source of learning and wisdom, in which the subject plays above With the text, making sense to multiply. In the Jewish culture, it instructs the reader of the sacred stories to sail on the river of polysemy, deconstruct the text, spread the centers of interest and key questions in the blanks. This ancient practice of reading Scripture says that Judaism is permanently allocated to the incompleteness and feed their own insatiable hunger. [6]
Finally, be on the reading of a text, or unconscious, is a thought turned to otherness, who lives in a place (...) close relationship which is designed as disjunction. [7]
Freud discovered a method of listening, and (...) this new space, a new topology of the soul, where all the contradictions coexist. [8] and alludes to the desire to think the unthinkable, the unspeakable and invisible. The drive.
The drive is a limit concept between the psychic and somatic, ie, does not belong to one or other record but is between the two. It is, however, a first engine that drives everything. The drive forcefully illustrates the position of psychoanalysis atopic. Because if something makes the drive is just that: move, push, has a goal and direction. Not return to where it already was. Run rendering representation of narrative in the story, the script in script, character in character, from story to story, as in the Torah. Freud exposes
2-way analysis of apprehension, which in principle would seem entirely exclusive: the way of deciphering meaning, and the path of psychic energy and the economy: energy and direction in the same space, the first and second topical connecting on their own contributions. Seduction and fantasy, establishing a complex set of mutual interference.
A set of interpretations of the occult who had no territory within the time when Freud's work appeared in the first 40 years of the twentieth century, when the rational demands of logical coherence and synthesis inherent positive science closed its doors, because the unconscious is located in another register, (...) is about the inconsistency, the unspeakable and invisible. [9]
Psychoanalysis announced at that time as a method of listening to the incoherent, the non-identical and the deformed, always obeying the logic of another. [10]
Derrida is a theoretical discussion of writing that the privilege accorded to speech and voice in the West. Insists on showing that writing produces many ways.
deconstruct a text, according to this philosopher, is to denounce what it was privileged, on behalf of it, pointing out what was repressed, appreciate it and insert it into a new context.
is a relentless critic working for the displacement of meaning and the possibility of inscribing new meanings.
Exile is to make the subject look - in the discouragement of repetition and gradual deconstruction of his own idolatry - the encounter with the stranger who has in himself, face to face with the unknown, which implies the risk of encountering the ever wandering drive impersonal force, a force for all time and all men. Experience
analytical exile, then, learning of otherness allows the subject to look through a designation for that word, coming from outside, this in itself, although it is strange. [11]
This difference in ourselves that psychoanalysis seeks to engage the haunting enigma: the same runout of know unconscious "and its condition of possibility, the drive, installed an impregnable place of otherness in the psychoanalytic field. [12]
"The uncanny" is the most appropriate translation for the title of the essay "Das Unheimliche" written in 1919 in which Freud developed the idea that there is an intrinsic strangeness the subject.
The strange thing is the horrific truth of the subject, referring to what he does as much is known and familiar:
helplessness.
means what I miss being at the same time as foreign and the depths, is inaccessible to a transparent look, by contrast comes in the form of anguish and horror of dull compared to her appearance: face to face with what has no name, which is beyond fantasy and , as Lacan shows in his seminar "Anxiety", affect the subject of the unconscious, which arises when the ego is confronted with the strange, the anguish.
(...) The death drive reveals the dimension of human existence as something unattainable to any totalizing knowledge. This is a concept which, no doubt, psychoanalysis will ensure not to lock on itself, forcing him to constantly interact with the difference: there is no name on Freudianism that does not stop not being written which guarantees the future. [13]
B
long time there are records about the reading of Bible stories as metaphors for talking about dialogue between the subject and what is beyond language.
The black side of that search becomes aggressive dimension that appears in front of the other's difference. The aggression will not wake up in front of a difference either, wake up from that of other causes distress in the subject.
And when Psychoanalysis speaks of horror of castration are talking of the anguish that makes the difference. [14]
The anguish, the bitter sound of silence, this gap arises against stunning, known them all: the passage through the desert, the exile to which it is intended to expand birth.
The great metaphor for thinking about the phenomenon of transference in the analysis, the Song of Songs, a biblical poem dramatizes the paradox of a meeting always, always impossible and that in itself is its persistence and separation. Intoxicating.
And I think that is where ethics comes, the responsibility and awareness of caring for one's own aggression.
psychoanalysis must remain a discipline that calls and demands the responsibility of the subject by the other. [15]
is to witness the unbridled instinctual struggle that is played in every word and every image, favoring life as a way of dealing with homelessness.
Foundations of the drive is based on the inability to set a performance: the drive is translated only as a power that is present in ephemeral and transient performances. [16]
analytical treatments of Freud, since he discovered the transfer [17] , came to have as a method of receiving and analyzing wake up in the drive energies (affection) and repressed memories (.. .) This golden rule leads to the necessary presence of the absence of the object [18] to circulate the drive.
All Freud's recommendations on the management of the transfer, far from constituting moral rules require that the analyst take the place of object of desire for the analysis, if the analyst does not agree, then the flow is impeded drive by which the subject emerges.
transfer
Love hinders the cure, the analyst is what leads to the treatment as long as you know rely on him to accept the love, we analyze that weaves his story with words of love for each other. [19]
All Freud never tired of showing his work along the unconscious complaint is that the death of a complete truth, beauty.
Read the unconscious is to admit that there will always be a remainder assimilated.
floating listening, then, the means by which the ear reads, ie, the analyst is set to hear a text that is out of the landscape, itself invisible, hence to make the necessary structures to ensure the continuity of the working of the patient.
Thus, the analyst also is a reader of the infinite melody of the drive. Sabina
Alazraki
May 2007
Page 49 [2]
Page 181 [3] Eretz Yisroel: The Land of Israel (the specific region, lost in exile.)
[4] Page 18
[5] Page 19
[6] Page 83
[7] Page 44
[8] Page 45
[9] Page 72
[10] Page 69
[11] Page 54
[12 ] Page 86
[13] Page 103
[14]
Page 118 [15]
Page 180 [16]
Page 129 [17] download link points to the importance of privacy.
[18] The presence of negative
object [19] Page 142
0 comments:
Post a Comment